Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barbarajohnson1/Archive

28 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

All the given users have been entering unreferenced information in the CK Morgan article, which is a BLP. I first noticed this possible case of sockpuppetry when I failed to verify the change of the subject's birth date by User:79.223.77.135 here, and after reverting it, added maintenance templates noting the lack of a citation. This IP removed the maintenance templates without explanation and changed back the birth date in these edits. After I reverted the changes and posted a notice on the user's talk page, Barbarajohnson1 made the same type of revert here.

Several of these users have also been experimenting with image galleries, which is unusual: 93.200.236.129 and Barbarajohnson1.

Certain edit summaries by different users are also suspiciously similar, although this could just be a regional English thing that I am not aware of. Compare Barbarajohnson1, 93.200.236.129, and Craigadams123.

I should also note that all of the above users, as well as User:79.223.74.76, User: 87.181.239.198, and User: 93.200.250.246 have made multiple edits to CK Morgan, and to nothing else. These IPs, as well as the two I listed above, look up to Deutsche Telekom AG in Niedersachsen state, with all but 93.200.236.129 looking up to the city of Hanover.

There may also be more instances of these users doing things such as changing dates in the article without referencing the new information, but that is weak behavioural evidence, and I thus haven't investigated the edit history of the article as thoroughly.

I'm erring on the side of caution in personally responding to this, because there are new users and I don't want to BITE. However, it is quite frustrating to try to introduce Wikipedia guidelines to this user, only to see it ignored and the same actions taken on a different account. Joe SchmedleyT* 18:29, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * I agree with Joe Schmedley's analysis and was going to report these accounts myself, but saw that it had been done already. Coretheapple (talk) 18:44, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * While it's likely they are the same user, there is zero overlap between the two accounts, so it could just be a user abandoning an old account and starting fresh. Barbarajohnson1 warned about editing while logged out. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:01, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

17 April 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Sole edits have been to re-create CK Morgan at C.K M.O.R.G.A.N (FlyBoy) and C.K M.O.R.G.A.N (DaFlyBoy), following AFD, along with this request for undeletion of one of the above. The intention clearly seems to be to slip the re-post under the radar using multiple accounts and title spellings. Ruby  Murray  13:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , and  are all  the same editor.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:41, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked per CU results which are confirmed by behaviour. Closing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:23, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

28 July 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The above sock is a WP:DUCK reappearance of permablocked Barbarajohnson1, contributions confined solely to now-deleted article CK Morgan and related AFD. Only one contribution remains, as Morgan article has been deleted. Coretheapple (talk) 16:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, blocked and tagged.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

01 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck: recreation of salted CK Morgan at Draft:CK Morgan in Oct. 2014, at CK Morgan- Singer in February, then again at CK Morgan (Flyboy) today. Dai Pritchard (talk) 15:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Time to salt CK Morgan and every possible permutation thereof. Coretheapple (talk) 21:00, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I've blocked the account and deleted the draft article that was clearly being used to circumvent the salting of CK Morgan last July.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

14 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.k Morgan. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:15, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It is obvious that this account is either a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet, created to re-create a page which has been deleted at least eleven times under at least eight titles that I know of. Similarities in use of English and comments made suggest sock, but other evidence suggests meat, but it makes no difference: an indefinite block is on its way in either case. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:48, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

18 October 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of C.k Morgan. duffbeerforme (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Obvious. Blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:28, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

11 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at CK- Morgan and C.k. Morgan. Also the username is close to the last sock JgabbanaGirl duffbeerforme (talk) 11:40, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeffing and closing.

19 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.k-Morgan. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  03:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeffing and closing.

23 November 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at ‎C.K-Morgan. Norvoid (talk) 15:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Duck; blocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

01 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.K Morgan (singer). duffbeerforme (talk) 23:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged based on obvious behavior. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

21 December 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.k Morgan (flyboy). duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC) duffbeerforme (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Note that multiple users have attempted to nominate for speedy deletion and template is repeatedly removed by IP editors. Coretheapple (talk) 13:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Chrisyeboahajei has been tagged and blocked indef per behavioral evidence. I've blocked 93.200.255.12 and 109.47.3.98 three days for block evasion, and I've deleted the latest recreation. Closing case now. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:06, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

07 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.k .Morgan. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:58, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged based on behavior. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

18 January 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.K .Morgan. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Note that this sock removed the speedy deletion template for the article. Coretheapple (talk) 15:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ against suspected Barbarajohnson1 sock and blocked accordingly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  22:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

02 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan at Draft:C.k Morgan and Draft:CK Morgan (Singer) respectively. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged. Closing the case.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  08:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

13 February 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck: recreation of salted CK Morgan at C.K . Morgan NeemNarduni2 (talk) 17:09, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sock blocked and article deleted and salted.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:28, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

17 March 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Duck. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at C.k Morgan (Daflyboy). Also recreating Keche. duffbeerforme (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * time for another check user? duffbeerforme (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Adding GabbanaGirlQ who has a username like previous socks GabbanaGirlJ and JgabbanaGirl. Shares editing of Eddie Watson with socks GabbanaGirlJ and Jessicawilson2. Definitely time for a checkuser. duffbeerforme (talk) 02:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Clearly WP:DUCK situation. Coretheapple (talk) 14:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * and are ✅, blocked and tagged.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  15:44, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Quack. Recreation of CK Morgan, this time at CK Morgan (singer). duffbeerforme (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * WP:DUCK Neil N  talk to me 01:25, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreating Draft:C.k Morgan, a draft title used by two previous Barbarajohnson1 socks, with the same content as past-deleted C K Morgan articles. McGeddon (talk) 11:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Obvious sock blocked and tagged. Articles deleted as G5.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:35, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Recreation of the same stuff using different title C.k Morgan (DaFlyBoy). GSS (talk |c|em ) 17:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''


 * Clearly a sock. WP:DUCK in spades. Of course it doesn't matter, because if this sock is blocked there will be others, and more re-creations of the same article. Coretheapple (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The accounts in the archive are and, regardless, please don't request a CU without explaining why one is needed. CU declined. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocked Neil N  talk to me 19:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)