Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Barnstarr/Archive

Report date February 9 2009, 19:58 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * Evidence submitted by NJGW (talk)

This is obviously a sock of some disgruntled user. I don't know who, but they might have other socks. This one had a an attack page, and otherwise has only been involved in personal attacks.


 * Barnstarr's second (undeleted) edit was to the talk page of an IP vandal I had warned and reverted several times, calling me a "douchbag".
 * Barnstarr's first (now deleted) user page was an attack page (strange thing for a new user to have).
 * Barnstarr is continuing to be disruptive by making personal attacks on their pages, as well as labeling clean-up efforts as "vandalism"

-NJGW (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by NJGW (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests


 * Please provide a code letter. Tiptoety  talk 21:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * as a formality after reporter accepted that this would be fishing. Mayalld (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

no further action required Mayalld (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Barnstarr has been indef blocked for being disruptive, it was suggested that greater disruption would be needed to justify fishing. NJGW (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Conclusions