Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bashkiddy/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Suspected socks' first edits were all to contest the speedy deletion (for promotion) of the same page (see Talk:PolicyPal (which is now deleted)). Writing style is somewhat similar; reporting per WP:DUCK. MereTechnicality  ⚙  02:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Update: has requested on my talk page that a Checkuser be run to determine whether "User:St00pid is the one who is really at the bottom of all this." Block reasons given for sockpuppets also mention User:Bashkiddy, though I don't see any involvement from a non-CU perspective. MereTechnicality  ⚙  03:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I was busy watching Queen Bey so I couldn't take care of this earlier; the Prince tribute isn't all that engrossing so here we are. Yes--I ran CU, which showed one more editor on that same IP address but I couldn't link their behavior to that of those obvious socks, and their technical details seemed a bit different to a non-expert like me., maybe you can have a look. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Oh, right, yes--I forgot, but the oldest account is indeed User:Bashkiddy, whom I just blocked (only St00pid is older). Also on the list, and blocked, are User:Iswansky and User:Zhaoyan94. Drmies (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Whaddayaknow--User:Thatinterview is part of this gang too, which seems to be run out of the Central Singapore Community Development Council. Drmies (talk) 04:04, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All tagged. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  00:30, 17 February 2017 (UTC)