Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bayanarski/Archive

01 June 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Please note that this is only suspicion and I don't think the user should be banned if it turns out there is sockpuppetery, only warned, since this is a newcomer.

That said, the evidence is the following: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nelson_Jenkins&action=history

The article was tagger for CSD and (relatively) quickly afterwards, the CSD tag was removed by a new user, which might have been the original contributor. I insist on the might, as this is no real evidence. Xionbox₪ 12:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's possible/likely that they're the same, but I don't think we need a checkuser here. They've only each edited once, so I'm going to let them both off with warnings. Relist if things happen, though. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

15 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

more SPA accounts created since the last investigation, hard to think they're not related given that all four accounts do nothing but prop up Nelson Jenkins. Hairhorn (talk) 15:58, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Per WP:DUCK, I've both socks blocked, and blocked the master for 31h. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 03:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  17:29, 17 July 2011 (UTC)