Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beaneater00/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ and . Closing TonyBallioni (talk) 21:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Self confessed, see ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Avian noises etc. (see also this comment which I have since removed) but for a sleeper check. Clearly, neither of these were their first account. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Found


 * who are ✅ to.
 * is very . All  ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * - is a confirmed sock of . Please merge this to Sockpuppet investigations/Beaneater00; it's not the oldest account, but it was the most well-known and active account and they were CBANned under that name. I'll retag the socks. Thanks.  --Blablubbs (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Merged, closing. GeneralNotability (talk) 19:08, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I was looking at recent vandalism at NONAZIS which Leroy08 had nominated for deletion (and a subsequent IP vandalized the talk page after Leroy08 was blocked) and noticed that in the filter log that Leroy08 had tried to paste Beaneater00's user page in his own space. This seems like a peculiar action for an unrelated new account to take so I'm reporting it here because of recent actions by Leroy08 and the IP editor. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Apparently, already confirmed Leroy08 to Beaneater00. However, this comment by Leroy08 about biological differences makes me rather think that they may be (SPI link), whose LTA page states as their first habitual behavior arguing that human races are biological opposed to social constructs. Could Beaneater00 have been a Mikemikev sock? Also note that Leroy08 hit at least two edit filters containing the word "LTA" (?)". As an aside, Zzuuzz has suggested that may also be related to Beaneater00 (and so to Mikemikev?). ☿  Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 21:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , That's very, very unlikely given what I know of Beaneater00 as the original blocking admin; likely, they are both just racist trolls who share some of the same views. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 22:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - clearly LTA, and the style of far-right trolling certainly resembles Beaneater's. Please look for others.  --Blablubbs (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * - ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * is ✅ to . Have not applied any (new) blocks or tags in this case. Have not widened the ranges to look for sleepers at the moment ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'll just clarify my part in this. When it comes to OldBolshevik, I was actually suggesting the opposite to what was inferred above, since someone suggested that Leroy08 was a sock of OldBolshevik. Leroy08 is indeed confirmed to Beaneater00, but I don't recognise who OldBolshevik is, and on any normal day I'd say they were unconnected to Beaneater00 (and see the ANI thread for context). But it's a bit of a weird crossover. -- zzuuzz (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm closing this; I note Zzuuzz's comment above, and considered removing the tag on OB, but since Zzuuzz has changed the tags already since making the comment I'll leave their version in place. Girth Summit  (blether)  22:10, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Refers directly in their one edit so far to yesterday's events involving Leroy08 and the other IP. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 23:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Girth Summit  (blether) 22:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I requested a G5 for Wikipedia talk:NONAZIS, and merely 4 minutes after it was deleted it was created again (log) by this IP, with a similar complaint to the 26 August one. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 01:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked, talk page deleted and semi-salted. GeneralNotability (talk) 02:05, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * ( original case name)


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

IP 2600:1016:B025:5D91:4487:EC0D:5CD7:389 was blocked by Green Giant on 3 August 2021 for long term abuse. Presumably that applied to a range. This particular IP's activity preceding the block was edit warring over a specific sentence on Confederate History Month:,. On 3 September, IP 2600:1700:7B20:B00:A887:C44A:A81A:6807 appeared and continued the same edit war:,. Now user CactusRoy, whose first edit was on 25 September, is continuing to edit war over the same sentence:, , , alongside a bunch of other POV-pushing along similar lines (e.g., , , ).

Given some of CactusRoy's other behavior, such as issuing template warnings and commenting on block appeal policy, they seem to have much more familiarity with Wikipedia than one would expect from a brand-new user. I'm not sure what the entire context of long term abuse which Green Giant referred to is, but given all the above this user looks like a WP:DUCK to me. Generalrelative (talk) 18:05, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Just updating here with additional diffs from ongoing edit warring:, . Generalrelative (talk) 18:26, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I'm not a sockpuppet of anyone, I'm my own man and I am quite offended by this as well as your disrespectful policy of following me around everywhere reverting/examining my edits. It seems strange to me that someone would come, in good faith, to volunteer on Wikipedia & then proceed to edit almost entirely on one topic (race), and when met with dissent immediately assume I am a 'sockpuppet' rather than a fellow editor and citizen. Perhaps you should calm down and be more inclined to compromise ? CactusRoy 🏴󠁣󠁡󠁱󠁣󠁿 ( talk ) 18:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This raised some suspicions (particularly the trolling on confederacy-related topics), so I asked for a comparison of the account to  off-wiki; CU data is a match, account is hence now blocked. I've merged this case to Beaneater per her private request. I'm not confident enough to block the recent IP for loutsocking, though it's certainly not implausible. Closing.  --Blablubbs (talk) 18:50, 3 October 2021 (UTC)