Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beevrrr/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

All these accounts are WP:SPAs that are focused mainly on Steven Pinker, with an anti-Pinker POV. The first two both keep removing the same material (e.g. and ). In the latter edit, McNulTEA says, After discussing the issue but not receiving any response in over 24 hours, I've excluded the names, but McNulTEA never posted on Talk - Beevrrr did. (Both of those have been given BLP DS notices, also.) The Redthank account seems to be focused on a different exact aspect of Pinker, but is also an SPA focused on negative things about Pinker. Crossroads -talk- 20:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC) P.S.: Turns out Redthank also got a DS notice: Crossroads -talk- 21:38, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Hmm. Well, I hope an administrator will also consider the POV behavior of these accounts in accord with DS. Crossroads -talk- 04:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Maybe WP:MEAT via social media? Anyway I've requested extended confirmed protection here. Crossroads -talk- 05:03, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - It is indeed suspicious that three accounts with similar POVs showed up to this article in the span of a month. The interaction Crossroads mentioned (where one account acted as if they had posted something that a different account did) is downright odd. I also note a few behavioral nuances in common (all usually end their edit summaries with a period, all have had issues with the number of spaces before the signature) which aren't exactly proof, but do make me more suspicious. Endorsed for a CU look. GeneralNotability (talk) 21:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * All three accounts are ❌. Mz7 (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)