Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Belbrabas/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

English  and Russian  Victor Prokopenya’s page have two vandals: Belbrabas and user 195.222.84.189.
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Belbrabas
 * https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Служебная:Вклад/Belbrabas
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/195.222.84.189
 * https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Служебная:Вклад/195.222.84.189

These users have the same behavior. Makes the same edits - deletes sourced credible information on arrest from the article or tries to distort it. These two users edit only the pages Viktor Prokopenya and cancel my edits without discussing the details  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Viktor_Prokopenya

Belbrabas and 195.222.84.189 used primary sources and personal POV to create article. These users maked massive vandal changes without discussing them. Belbrabas  is editing with legally wrong wording in biased way. He looks at editing as a battleground, behaves dishonestly. He Ignores arguments grounded by Wiki rules and by references to legislation and exact articles. He does not want to discuss how NPOV can be ensured. I ask to check the connection between these two users. 可愛い (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC) 可愛い (talk) 13:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

What is the purpose of this SPI? I don't really see what this SPI is for. Should ip be a vandal - then it should be reported on vandalism board. Initiator of SPI clearly pursues only revenge for my contributions to the article. RfC, mediation were offered to 可愛い to resolve problems, but instead of civilized dispute resolution edit warring and reporting were selected.

, who was previously reported for edit warring at Viktor Prokopenya, brings her personal vendetta for my sourced contributions to the article. Contributions are sourced with reliable third party sources like Deutsche Welle, Vice News, numerous Belarussian media.

Bad news is that continues her personal attacks and harrasment of me in violation of WP:NPA.


 * 1) Jim1138 already characterized edits of   as "whitewashing".
 * 2) "Lack of frankness" was noted by EdJohnston.

Please, help me at least to ensure civilty from. I've been making substantial contributions to the article, collected sources, expanded the article, paid attention to numerous mistakes made by previous authors. Belbrabas (talk) 13:44, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Case was stale when filed. If the IP and the named account return to editing at the same time and you still believe them to be the same person, file a new report. No comment from me technically. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

English and Russian Victor Prokopenya’s page have several vandals: Belbrabas, 195.222.84.189, CosWelbelis, Columnist272. They make vandal edits.These users also vandalize the pages of the Belarusian Decree, the High-Tech Park] and the business partner of Viktor Prokopenya Mikhail Gutseriev. Belbrabas] used primary sources and personal POV to create article. These users maked massive vandal changes without discussing them. Belbrabas  is editing with legally wrong wording in biased way. He looks at editing as a battleground, behaves dishonestly. He Ignores arguments grounded by Wiki rules and by references to legislation and exact articles. He does not want to discuss how NPOV can be ensured. I ask to check the connection between these users. It is second or subsequent request to the previous existing cases on: Sockpuppet investigations/Belbrabas. The case was not considered. I received the answer: «Case was stale when filed. If the IP and the named account return to editing at the same time and you still believe them to be the same person, file a new report. No comment from me technically. Closing. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2019» I ask to check the connection between these users Belbrabas, 195.222.84.189, Columnist272, CosWelbelis. 可愛い (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC) 可愛い (talk) 09:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:04, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅. Indeffing all. I have semi-protected some of the articles.
 * Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

See below. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:41, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ . — Berean Hunter   (talk)  10:42, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Closing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2019 (UTC)