Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Berfu/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Identical topic focus: e.g. DrKay (talk) 23:25, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I have only one account which I use both English and Turkish wikis. I don’t have another account. If other persons are doing same edit as me it is because we are trying to correct same mistakes. For example we both removed Mountbatten-Windsor surname from british royals simply because they don’t built their career on that name. For example Prince William graduates from university under William Wales, not under William Mountbatten-Windsor. His army career built around same name, William Wales. And they birth certificates (official documents, public documents) does not state that information too. If we are focusing same identical topics because Wikipedia is doing same mistake for royal biographies. If they don’t use that name for their careers, how wikipedia can? That means rewriting history. I wrote on talk pages and group projects too by the way. And didn’t see any comments to justify why wikipedia is adding unused surname to full name section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Berfu (talk • contribs) 12:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

By the way now there is a discussion about similar need of changes in the articles Talk:British royal family. Berfu (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
The shared interests and behavioral overlap do not suggest sockpuppetry to me. Closing without action. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)