Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BerylTurns50/Archive

27 November 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

Exactly the same pattern of edits promoting the film Sparrow and all the non-notable people who are associated with it. Michig (talk) 07:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC) c.f. the contributions of the confirmed socks.--Michig (talk) 15:00, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
It's they're the same. Behavior will need to be the deciding factor here. TN X Man 14:48, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm calling it based on behavior. Blocked and tagged. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:41, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

05 December 2010

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

I first spotted the user in the history of Weblo, where he or she is one of the earliest editors, right after User:Wikitrueforever and User:Keith1234, both of whom are banned sockpuppets of User:BerylTurns50. Beryl also operated User:SheepGoBaaa, User:YellowPlains, and User:OohAahJustaLittleBit, perhaps more. The editing history is strangely similar; a fixation on the name Longley, the film Sparrow, Eric Kolelas,  and no doubt more. Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 12:54, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm closing this for now. The account hadn't edited in three and a half months, and I think a block on it would be a bit premature. But please relist if the account becomes active again. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

21 May 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Edits and creates article for the same exact set of independent films and actors as all of the other socks of BerylTurns50. Also leaves the same exact very brief edit summaries on the same articles as all the other socks. Started editing shortly after the last known sock was blocked, edited the same film titles as the other socks, and soon went right back to the same exact behavior for the same exact independent movies. Ridernyc (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Right on the cusp of DUCK without the ability to see deleted contribs. Bunting to an admin to see if deleted contribs line up as well.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  02:38, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The master and other accounts have no deleted edits. The majority of FilmFan2011's deleted edits are to an article they created, Robbie Curran. The rest of the edits are to files/images they uploaded to include in Alexis Jayne Defoe, Thomas James Longley and Robbie Curran. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:19, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted contrib summaries of FF are detailed and verbose, and do not match FF's non-deleted nor master's summaries.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  14:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * 3 intersects for TheChessMaster3000, 5 for OohAahJustaLittleBit, 2 for BerylTurns50, 4 for SheepGoBaaa, 1 for YellowPlains, 14 for Keith1234, 5 for Wikitrueforever. This is pretty hard to ignore, but having trouble connecting the dots on behavior.  There are some similarities, enough to be on the cusp.  Dennis Brown  -  2&cent;   &copy;  13:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Closing as no action taken. Please refile if there is new evidence. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—►  02:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)