Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Betteruser/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Betteruser was the sockmaster, and has since been blocked, as has the sock puppet account Bobonagblockdito. The IP editor 112.205.1.155 appears to have started editing frequently and in a similar manner to Betteruser, shortly after the account was blocked in mid-March. Notably, both Betteruser and the IP 112.205.1.155 have made numerous additions to the page Sinophile, and edits about the influence of Chinese philosophy on various European philosophers, ,,. Also of note is that all three accounts made extensive additions in a short time to pages related to Chien-Shiung Wu and the Wu experiment. ,,,. While 112.201.126.55 hasn't been active for a few weeks, they also seem to have followed similar editing patterns, , as well as to Sinophile and Jose Diokno, an article frequently edited by Betteruser. Darth Coracle (talk) 02:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * 112.205.1.155 blocked two months. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same pervasive and poorly sourced additions to pages like Sinophile, images to Jose Diokno, and now also edits to Draft:Lin Xie. Here are some diffs, but there are plenty more:, , , ,. There's some more discussion at. Darth Coracle (talk) 21:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
I see shared POV-pushing, possibly coordinated, but there are some key differences (especially surrounding the use of the minor edit checkbox). Make of that what you will. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The overlap with Betteruser - POV-pushing to add Chinese/Eastern influences to various articles + hagiographic edits to the Dikono family - is convincing to me. . As a note for future clerks, I think there may be more than one person in this group. DrKay blocked four editors as a sockfarm:
 * Added some missing tags for the DrKay group. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Just a couple of days after was blocked for a second time, this new user has appeared to partially restore their edits. The other edit was on this page which has been mostly better user socks since October 2020. Requesting CU for sleepers, also suggest re semi-protecting the pages. CMD (talk) 13:13, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * It's certainly likely that Rocketlaunch is 112.205.1.155 (and Knottinghill), but with just three edits, there's really not enough to block on. The diff pair cited (Special:Diff/1036254391 vs Special:Diff/1034068613) has enough differences that I'm inclined to think two different people (although clearly collaborating), a possibility which  also noted in an earlier report.  I left them uw-agf-sock and I'll let it go at that.  We can always take another look later. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * - I know this is unusual, but Special:Diff/1036347336 is an admission of socking, so it seems my attempt to AGF was misplaced. Given the number of socks we've seen already, their claim that they did not understand our socking policy is not credible and I'm requesting CU to look for sleepers and confirm vs  and  so we have a baseline going forward. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Synchronize6th, Knottinghill, and Rocketlaunch81 are ✅ to each other, but the master is stale. . NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The most recent SPI on closed on 31 July 2021. Rarionite appeared on 4 August, making a small restoration of an image and caption previously added by Rocketlaunch. After a couple of weeks, they made some more edits including this one again to the Jose Diokno page. This is not a 1:1 text recreation, but is very obviously a restoration of these Rocketlaunch edits. Note for example the sentence on the Mendiola Massacre in the same place, the tweaking of the Arroyo declaration, and the addition of the Calle street in Batangas. There is also this change, which is again a not 1:1 but similar edit to this one. A look at the global contributions shows further the focus on Jose Diokno. CMD (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Rarionite is technically to blocked socks in the archive. Based on that and the behaviour I've blocked and tagged. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

 * (added for comparison purposes}
 * (added for comparison purposes}


 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Following the block of the account, this one emerged with the usual key focus on the Jose Diokno article, alongside edits relating to the Free Legal Assistance Group (see this history which shows the multiple socks including Rocketlaunch81, Synchronize6th, and some IPs). CMD (talk) 14:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - The overlap in articles edited, as well as the timing of Potestate being created a couple of days after Rarionite was blocked, are red flags, but I'm not seeing enough exact similarities in edits to block on behavior alone. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅. PhilKnight (talk) 22:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked and tagged. Closing. PhilKnight (talk) 22:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

was just blocked, and now this new account has popped up with the same focus Diokno. Given this is now a few months of repeated sockpuppeting, I would suggest semi-protection would be a good course of action here. CMD (talk) 05:56, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . I'm not sure protection would be that useful just because of how many articles they edit (and frankly, their edits to Dikono articles are a great indicator). GeneralNotability (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @GeneralNotability I've gone ahead and semi-protected their two most popular targets, Sinophile and Jose Diokno. If you feel that leaving them unprotected as a honey-pot would be preferable, I have no objection. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , no issue with you protecting those. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

These are CU-confirmed with each other, and my check follows a notice on ANI about a disruptive IP editor. Please note, however, that Ramonetor is making the same edits to that Free Legal article as Rocketlaunch81, listed in this SPI--but also User:BMirror119, whom blocked as a likely sock of JesusJohnson7, Sockpuppet investigations/JesusJohnson7/Archive. Note also that User:Menninte is marked as a sock of JJ7, but this edit is the same edit Ramonetor made. In other words, I think these two SPIs need to be merged. And good god, how childish all this is. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Drmies (talk) 15:27, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I checked some of the most prolific socks from both cases, and I'm not seeing any cross-commonality of IP or UA. Nor do I see much commonality in pages edited or timecards.  So, my hunch is that while there may well be some mis-categorized socks, I'm not getting the vibe that we should do a wholesale case merge. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * PS, I left some notes in cu-wiki. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Drmies Unless you feel strongly about the merge, I'd like to close this as is. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * RoySmith, I don't--go ahead and do what you think is right, and I thank you for doing all this administrative work. Drmies (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Reinstating the edits of, who I think was mis-assigned a master due to the standard Betteruser interest in topics like the Free Legal Assistance Group and Commission on Human Rights (Philippines). Either way, someone's sock. CMD (talk) 04:10, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Adding Bonadito, exactly the same. CMD (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
'''This case is being reviewed by Tamzin as part of her training as a clerk. Please allow her to process the entire case without interference. You may pose any questions or concerns either on her talk page or on this page.'''
 * The CU data would have me believe both of these are unrelated to each other or anybody else in this case (or, for that matter, Sockpuppet investigations/JesusJohnson7). But, I don't really believe any of the data.   -- RoySmith (talk) 20:29, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't see how this could be anyone other than Betteruser. (Based on stuff like Special:Diff/1036361002, Betteruser definitely seems like the better user to tag Missileworker as; I've adjusted it so Missileworker is double-tagged under both masters.) This clear a pattern of restoring past sock edits word for word is too ducky to ignore, CU evidence or no. : Please block both accounts indefinitely as suspected sox. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
 * clpo13(talk) 04:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The latest sock, whose contributions follow the usual focus on the Diokno family and related articles such as the Free Legal Assistance Group and De La Salle University (eg.). Compare for example this old sock edit and this recent edit for the same wording changes. This edit by the original account tracked to this page move. CMD (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU data is, as usual, rather confused, but there's enough there to push me into the zone. Coupled with the ducky edits, this is enough for me. I don't see any other accounts with the same tells on the range they're using.   Girth Summit  (blether)  09:23, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * - hang on - on closer inspection, I think there are more.  Girth Summit  (blether)  09:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm confident that Chizescuderosr is also them. Adding, blocking, tagging, closing.  Girth Summit  (blether)  09:31, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same interests, edits to Sinophile, De La Salle University , Jose Diokno , and Diokno related pages ,. Not sure if any previous socks did this, but this one also wrote a thank you message for themself on their own talk page:. Darth Coracle (talk) 06:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - there are quite a few accounts here. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to :
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit  (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * They are consistent with notes about Betteruser on cuwiki - blocking, tagging, closing. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same edit summaries ie. (.), moving articles to include middle names where not necessary: example by previous sock, where there is overlap in teh same article, current sock, in particular please compare the edit summaries of this past sock to the current one, the (.) is very telling. <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Also overlap here, here, here with two past socks, and similar edit summaries (again with the (.)) <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Endorsing CU based on the last check despite those being stale given the massive amounts of socking. <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:51, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * All of these are ✅ to each other and to  from 22 January 2022. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * And some more: -- RoySmith (talk) 01:54, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Blocking all of those. I'll leave it to a clerk to figure out how to tag them. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Tagged as proven, closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
See page move here again <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -yep, same "." and "," edit summaries too. Endorsing for a sleeper check as the last one found many accounts and some of these accounts are quite old. This endorse goes for the two cases below too. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * -  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The following are all ✅ to one another and to the last round of socks in the archive.
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I will block and tag as proven. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Timiturner's only edits have been to two pages that have been very recently edited by socks of Betteruser (pages are Chel Diokno and Draft:Carmen I. Diokno). Pretty clear duck. Curbon7 (talk) 16:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - see above. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirmed - see 5 July case above.   Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Found another one. Same edit summary style, edited articles, and move warring style. Curbon7 (talk) 16:46, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - see above. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:14, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Confirmed - see 5 July case above.  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  09:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
more attempts to change Claudio Teehankee to Claudio O. Teehankee <span style="color: white; font-weight: bold; background: linear-gradient(red, orange, green, blue, indigo, violet)">PRAXIDICAE🌈  21:17, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * They've switched up the edit summaries from "." to ". " this time. Fun. again since previous checks found many socks. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- RoySmith (talk) 12:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually, just confirmed to the recent batches, but can't get all the way back to the master, so retagging as proven. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
On Claudio Teehankee. Newly created account with a symbol eidt summary and complete vandalism on the same overlapping page. Curbon7 (talk) 01:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Ooh some new symbols in the edit summary this time. Still quacking loudly. Blocked, tagged as proven, closing. firefly  ( t · c ) 10:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
This diff. Same article that has been previously targeted by BU socks, with the same edit summary ("."). WP:DUCK. Curbon7 (talk) 18:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * , closing. Spicy (talk) 09:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Per contribs. Has edited many of the same articles as BU socks (for example Claudio Teehankee) and has the same edit summary style of a single period. Curbon7 (talk) 20:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Wow that was a lot more socks than I expected. I've watchlisted several of those articles. Curbon7 (talk) 03:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * It's essentially a pervasive WP:COI case, I haven't seen edits outside of that COI sphere be any more disruptive than regular new user efforts. CMD (talk) 03:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged. There were a lot of accounts, page moves, and edits.  If this is a disruptive editor, someone should probably look at them.  I don't really know anything about the case. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:33, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Same edit summary style (".") and interest in same articles (Free Legal Assistance Group). Curbon7 (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - there's at least one more, hang on.  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  16:44, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ to numerous confirmed accounts, plus . Blocking and tagging. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  16:51, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Within two minutes of creating their account, this user made their first mainspace edit to a perennial BU sock target (diff) in which they insert uploaded by confirmed BU sock. Curbon7 (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Confirmed with Bongbongmarcos, Justdoitmj, and Lobsterslam. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Closing. Thanks, Spicy (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)