Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhutes/Archive

21 October 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Botha ccounts are effectively SPA, editing Unique Identification Authority of India. Edit summaries show similar unusual phrasing, eg this edit by Bhutes with the phrase "total number of AADHAARs issued till date" and this edit by Ravishyam Bangalore using the phrase "Developed till 17-Aug-13". After Ravishyam Bangalore received notification of 3RR Bhutes, who had been inactive for ten days, reappeared to make the next reversion. He then made the next reversion before Ravishyam Bangalore returned to carry out the next reversion, deftly sidestepping 3RR. Both accounts also revert using the summary "Reverting Vandalism" which, per WP:NOT VANDALISM, is innaccurate and also possibly a further attempt to game and avoid 3RR. Blackberry Sorbet  14:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.'' Hi, I own only single account Ravishyam Bangalore. Bhutes id is not mine and it been there before I registered. IP addresses should be able to prove that.

UIDAI article was skewed, maligning. politicized by the group of vested interests. Aadhaar is supposed to be anti-corruption administrative tool which is hated by the vested interests. Statements like "Land scam for UIDAI Head Quarters" defies all logic & common-sense because the use of land transferred by the Government from one of its non-functional departments to another govt department(UIDAI) cannot be scam, there is no money-transaction, nor any private party is involved. My para "Who is afraid of Aadhaar & Why" is very painful to the beneficiaries of corruption which has been derailing public wefare programs in India.

The progress on "Aadhaar Enrollment & Generation" periodically updated by Bhutes was also deleted. Some people do not want any positive & true information to spread against the principle of Wikipedia.

My edits with sufficient Citations were repeatedly Undone without giving reasons or coming for discussion on the Talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravishyam Bangalore (talk • contribs) 08:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Ravishyam Bangalore (talk) 08:04, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Checkuser results are largely ❌ to . Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No action. I came here due to some copyvio problems in the article. Hopefully that'll lead to sorting it all out. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  09:22, 23 October 2013 (UTC)