Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biaswarrior/Archive

Report date July 8 2009, 22:36 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Both accounts are intended to harass. Ricky28618 admits to being a sock of an established user. Blueboy96 22:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Blueboy96


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users

Requested by Blueboy96 22:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests
 * - Based upon the comment made by Ricky28618, CheckUser is warranted to check for the possibility of sleepers. Tiptoety  talk 23:39, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * ✅. These appear to be . – Luna Santin  (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Case moved from Sockpuppet investigations/Ricky28618. Tiptoety  talk 23:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Blocked & tagged. Tiptoety  talk 23:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Report date September 8 2009, 04:27 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)
 * I also believe it is possible there is two other accounts connected. User:Evans1982 and User talk:Ksdifjjl. All of these editors have a few of the same pages in their contrib history and also same genres f interest. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The above share edits on the same pages within the same timefarme and also exhibit similiar editing habits. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 04:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)

Same 3 page edits as the others. Glenn Beck Tea Party protests and Susan Roesgen Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Evidence submitted by Hell In A Bucket (talk)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * "these editors have a few of the same pages in their contrib history" Hahahah! Dude, I'm sure I share a few of the same pages in my "contrib" history with a lot of other users. That kind of thing happens in Wikipedia. Duh! It's a collaborative encyclopedia! Go ahead and check my ISP and compared to these other users. And please stop vandalizing my userpage! -- Evans1982 (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm 99 percent sure that "Fight the Bias" and "Iadmitmybaiswhydon'tyou?" is the same person. Both are involved on the same conflict, to put it bluntly. This also comes from my previous involvement with both of them. Abce2 |  Talk  Sign  10:32, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Requested by Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC) MuZemike 17:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * CheckUser requests

✅ =.
 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Other than that, I'm not seeing any connections at all here. I'm going to leave this open for another checkuser to give a second opinion on. J.delanoy gabs adds 18:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I had a look at this yesterday and didn't find anything either. Endorse findings. Brandon (talk) 21:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Iadmitmybias and Terminator both indef blocked. NW ( Talk ) 02:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Iadmitmybiaswhycantyou? has been indefinitely blocked as a sock of Biaswarrior User:TheTerminator101 and has been tagged as such. All other suspected socks listed above that have not been confirmed have been untagged. MuZemike 14:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)