Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigbrothersorder/Archive

Evidence submitted by Ian.thomson
Pushing same POV edits in Meenas, same tendency to shout, and same mention of "university books" in edit summaries as if that is a proper citation. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:30, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

The IP I added has not been using the edit summaries, but has made pretty much the same edits to the same articles - 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:47, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
I don't why i didn't notice the quacking earlier, this is obviously meenas from the evidence submitted by Ian--Lerdthenerd (talk) 15:36, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

They are obviously the same accounts, per WP:DUCK, thought I do note that while the bigbrotherthing account is now blocked for edit warring, the other two accounts have not edited since the 25th and the 3rd of September respectively. Though I don't see any positive contributions forthcoming from the user at all. --S.G.(GH) ping! 17:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * I moved this SPI to Bigbrothersorder as that is the older account and was more recently active. I've tagged and blocked Agnivanshitribalmeenas as a sockpuppet, and left a warning with Bigbrothersorder about multiple accounts. The IP hasn't been active in a month so there's no real reason to act on that. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)