Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigchungus01/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

On the 7th January BC01 vandalised the Tiffin School article and was subsequently blocked soon after,

On the 9th January BC06 appeared adding what I would consider to be more or less promo to the Tiffin School article and then today (10th Jan) they returned as BC04 and added a section on ties (again on the same article),

Obvious duck is obvious I would say, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 17:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I've also added "Potaato potaato" which appears to be their first account (judging by the similar edits and edit summaries), No objections if anyone wants to run a CU on these, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 18:00, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Added BigChungus24 too. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Added CU given the account below. Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 19:04, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * you can also include, name alone gives it away, also vandalising . Agent00x (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Chungusbig is ❌.
 * Potaato potaato, which is the oldest account, is /.
 * The remaining accounts are ✅ to each other, and the unblocked accounts are blocked without tags.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:01, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * All accounts are already blocked, so this can be closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  01:07, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Did your check turn up any potential connection to or ? Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * In my findings above, I said that BigChungus1 was ✅. I've never heard of BigChungus12 until now.--Bbb23 (talk) 02:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Reclosing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:15, 14 January 2019 (UTC)