Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bigles/Archive

02 May 2016

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

With regards to summary edit text that are similar to each other &  also same & equal reverted content edit at the time of close. K!lluminati (talk) 00:57, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Let me explain better, template page involved in a edit war on 1 May 2016 i was arguing with user:PutItOnAMap and edits revert process continued as well, that of a sudden user:Bigles enterd to dispute with telling "See Below" at edit summary  pointing out that to last revert by user:PutItOnAMap  which of course phrase of "Based on discussion results." written to imitate the me.  it seems that all of them are suspicious & doubtful things. furthermore, user:Bigles has a acquaint with intrusion into topics. E.G.:


 * 24 March 2016 "Undid revision 711625440 by K!lluminati"
 * (2 diffs ahead) user:PutItOnAMap: "My source was reliable (criticalthreats). Yours was unreliable pro-Houthi, and did not deny that Hadi forces had control. I am reverting to all changes,"


 * 23 March 2016 "Reverted K!lluminati edits. STOP VANDALISM K!lluminati! This is not the first time!"
 * (few diffs previous) user:PutItOnAMap: "http://www.criticalthreats.org/gulf-aden-security-review/gulf-aden-security-review-march-23-2016"


 * 27 February 2016 "Undid revision 707283189 by K!lluminati."


 * And other numerous cases that is visible in user contributions: . regards to what was said demand to continuation of inspection process.
 * thanks. K!lluminati (talk) 09:21, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
You've presented zero evidence of sock puppetry. Even the two diffs you've provided do not support what you say about them (they are not similar at all). If you don't present any evidence, this case will be closed with no action.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The little evidence you've presented is not persuasive of sock puppetry. You've shown only that you and other users in a very contentious area of Wikipedia don't agree with each other. You've also presented no evidence regarding Panam2014. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 11:53, 3 May 2016 (UTC)