Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binodkpn/Archive

29 September 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Blocked Bindokpn for persistent spamming and copyvios a while ago. Aashiedits already blocked as a duck, deleted contribs were also used in making that determination. MISHRACOM looks to be quacking pretty loudly as well, but I suspect sleepers as well as that account was set up before the other was blocked, so requesting a CU to sweep for those. Have semi-protected target articles for a while as well, this looks a lot like another paid editing situation. When one account gets blocked for spamming and copyright violations another steps up and does it all again. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Anybody care to look at MISHRACOM from a non-technical, behavior based standpoint? I don't mean to just dump this on ya'll but the fact is I am just about to go offline for about a week and this will probably be my last edit until I get back, I simply don't have the time to take a deeper look right now. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:57, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is actually from a purely technical standpoint.
 * However, the following accounts are ✅ sockpuppets of each other:


 * Thanks. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All blocked and tagged, closing . Legoktm (talk) 19:48, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
 * There is not a substantial editing history to go on, but on multiple behavioral measures, MISHRA does not look similar to the others, in my opinion. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:20, 8 October 2013 (UTC)