Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binukurisinkal/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

There has been concerted focus on Muthoot Pappachan Group and each of these accounts has added the same copvio content (for which am seeking revdel) to that article copied from several Muthoot websites (eg. this one with its particular phrase "started in a humble way as a retail and whole-sale trader of grains at Kozhencherry"). See: It may be that (a Muthoot employee per ) may be distinct from  and  who appear to a paid editor; yet they could be the same person based on their contribs. But content-wise all three have made the same edits. Jytdog (talk) 03:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * first added it here; that account was blocked ( for a username violation) and what appears to be their legit 2nd account
 * added it again
 * here and then edit warred it back again here
 * added it back yet again here and edit warred it back in here


 * Kevin thanks for your note. I asked for CU because the more data the better - there may be one or two people here, and heck it could be three and I am wrong (unlikely as that seems);  it also picks up additional accounts that we might not be aware of now (especially important I think where there appears to be freelancing going on).  But if someone is comfortable taking action on these three based on DUCK alone and wants to cancel the CU I will not complain. Jytdog (talk) 23:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I'm inclined to decline the CU request as unnecessary as a DUCK case, but I wanted to check with you before doing so if there is anything special about this that warrants CU? Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Alright. I'm requesting admin action for blocks of all three unblocked accounts per DUCK – one to two weeks for the master (as although 3RR wasn't broken, it certainly has the spirit of an edit war). CUs typically don't do checks if the outcome can be decided behaviorally, and given that the socking activity has been confined to this article only, I feel the chance of other connected accounts is low. Thanks, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 23:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * bnt. Nakon  04:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks like you forgot the master. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 04:28, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems to be a script failure. I've blocked the master indef now.  Thanks for the catch!  Nakon  04:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, tagging master. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 04:35, 13 June 2016 (UTC)