Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blake24/Archive

16 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

I blocked VineViVenci as a sockpuppet of Hispanapsih who also appears to be edit warring while logged out. The article Lima also be related. Josefv3 and Dr. Galvez have also been reverting to add the image Limacollage. I think they may be related to the previous 2 or perhaps Blake24 but am not entirely sure yet. Requesting CU for confirmation whether Josefv3 and Galvez is related to Hispanapsih or if any/all of the accounts are related to Blake24 or a check to see if there's any other accounts present (I may have missed some). Elockid  ( Talk ) 02:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ as each other:



as each other:



Dr.Galvez is ❌. Moreover, it doesn't look like there is a likely connection between groups. –MuZemike 02:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I've blocked and tagged the Hispanapsih socks. I've also blocked Josefv3 as a suspected sock. Elockid  ( Talk ) 03:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

20 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

basically, having issues with a single image at the top of the article. In addition, having new issues on the talk page, which is what prompted me to file this report. Seems like a bunch of fake voices in the crowd supporting a change that consensus feels doesn't need made. have had several several edit wars, no good avail. Hires an editor (talk) 02:26, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Not much to go off of here, and we have CU results for most of the users already. Interesting enough all the accounts seem to be making this edit but don't look like they match in behavoir. Requesting another clerks opinion on what we should do. -- DQ  (t)   (e)  14:44, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ew. This is quite dicey. In one sense, that one edit is incredibly common, and there are a couple naming similarities. But their editing patterns, as stated by DQ, don't really line up. I'm going to defer to another clerk or CU: I'm quite unsure of what to do in this case. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I a sweep on range that was used quite recently by Blake24; these are technically  to be his accounts. I recommend closing this investigation without action, until Blake24 reappears (if indeed he does).  AGK  [&bull; ] 18:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * As technically unlikely, seems suitable to close. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 23:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)