Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BlakeIn2021/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
and that there are other new socks, hence the CU request. Chris Troutman ( talk )  20:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked. "Endorsed" for further CU in so far as an admin can do so. Izno (talk) 22:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * - A cursory check reveals quite a few of the accounts they're probably referring to in the admission.
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Given the number of accounts involved this is probably worth a closer look. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Of the non-blocked accounts, only BlakeMobilesIsBack is not stale and that account is on a different range to The Last BlakeMobiles. I couldn't see any more obvious socks on either range but they are very big, very busy ranges. CU is not going to be a lot of help here. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 12:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh well. Closing. Izno (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2024 (UTC)