Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blizzio/Archive

04 May 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This is a narrowly focused WP:SPA that only appears near posts by User:Khestwol on the talk pages of articles such as al-Nusra Front and Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant where the divisive sectarian term Wahhabism is trying to be inserted into the info boxes. Nulla Taciti (talk) 04:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Regarding this investigation. I dont believe I have interacted with user Khestowl. He commented under my post recently by simply agreeing with it. Nulla fails to see that in those article pages, several other users have reverted him for removing sourced content. Nulla threatened to open an investigation on me after I simply started a discussion on his talk page. Blizzio (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Please also note that there is currently a related discussion at Talk:Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant GregKaye 18:41, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Comment, note to admins: This report is a false accusation, agreeing with Blizzio on one thing does not make him me. But I would like to have your focus on Nulla Taciti. Nulla Taciti had just been topic-banned a while ago, for precisely the same reasons that he is repeating further since coming back from that ban i.e. removing sourced links to Wahhabism from several similar articles. His contribution to Wikipedia confirms that his account is being used for disruptive edit-warring on several similar topics. He pushes a certain POV and does not care for breaking reverting rules (WP:3RR and 1RR). He is mad at me just because I reverted to what is in consensus in talk pages, and because I reported him once at WP:AN/EW when he broke the 1RR rule at ISIL. He got a week long topic-ban for it which, in my opinion, was a bit too mild block for him. He has been also personally attacking me. A stronger than last time admin intervention against him will be much appreciated. It will save several articles from further disruption. Thank you. Khestwol (talk)
 * Comment As can be seen, Khestwol has something of a personal vendetta against me and is, unfortunately, resorting to making up WP:BADFAITH lies (I have never broke 3rr, as can be confirmed by my edit history). Regardless, the commuication style appears very similar to Blizzio, so something fishy seems to be going on here. Nulla Taciti (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Please provide diffs that illustrate how the accounts are related to each other. The more the better. Once you have done so, we can re-evaluate the case to see if a check is warranted. Otherwise, we will have close this case with no action taken. Mike V • Talk 19:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * With no followup, I'm closing this case with no action taken. Mike V • Talk 14:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)