Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BloombergInstitute/Archive

14 July 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I've had a user (User:Dusti) come to me with concerns that User:ThoughtInspiring is a potential sockpuppet of User:BloombergInstitute. Their main reason for concern was that the current version of the article (Bloomberg Aptitude Test) is almost identical to the version uploaded by BloombergInstitute, and that the account didn't start editing until recently and even then, only about this specific test. This has been somewhat of a point of contention in the AfD for the current version of the article, so I'd like to have this cleared up for the purposes of the AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * versus is very duck-y. Legoktm (talk) 06:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The master was blocked for their username using the block template which encourages them to just create a new account that is not in violation of the username policy. While I agree that it is rather obvious that these two accounts are being operated by one in the same person, there does not appear to be a violation of the sockpuppetry policy.  taken as far as this SPI is concerned.  Tiptoety  talk 18:01, 14 July 2013 (UTC)