Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bloomfield/Archive

Report date August 18 2009, 10:13 (UTC)

 * Suspected sockpuppets

Supporting evidence Same hit-and-run style as Bloomfield socks have had - user starts a new article by pasting the whole (highly wiki-formatted) content at once, never editing anything else again. Same as Bloomfield, the topics are obscure facts related to Estonia, usually either misleading or clever hoaxes (see - mixing up two different units; Murder of Pliner children - using dubious blogs and Wikipedia mirror as a source, etc).
 * Comments from filer

IP attempted to insert the same unsourced information to The Holocaust in Estonia as Addedpeass article Murder of Pliner children. However, as the ISP uses dynamic IP's, the data about the IP is probably stale. The IP is from same ISP and area as previous Bloomfield socks.

There are probably more socks that I've missed.

-- Sander Säde 10:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.


 * Comments by other users
 * The current behavior is most similar to that of user:Partisan1. Bloomfield was community banned on ANI in March 2009. Renata (talk) 13:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Could Partisan1 have been a sock of (also permbanned) and known to have socks? Also, if my memory serves me correctly, Roobit's ISP was Starman and he was coming from Tallinn area. -- Sander Säde  14:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * CheckUser request

MuZemike 17:24, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
 * are all ✅ to be the same. Brandon (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * that the accounts listed belong to banned user . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * are all ✅ to be the same. Brandon (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * that the accounts listed belong to banned user . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * are all ✅ to be the same. Brandon (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * that the accounts listed belong to banned user . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * are all ✅ to be the same. Brandon (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
 * that the accounts listed belong to banned user . Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 20:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Conclusions
 * Tagged and (being) blocked. NW ( Talk ) 23:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

26 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same "paste whole article at once" behavior as Bloomfield and his socks. Subject of the article is a member of Bloomfield's real-life extended family. , who is most familiar with Bloomfield's behavior, agrees that Antwerpen0000 is Bloomfield's sock. Sander Säde 07:23, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:02, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - All the CU data is . -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  10:25, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Indeffing sock and closing.