Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blpeditor3/Archive

31 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Very unusual edit war with multiple throwaway accounts.  F ASTILY  (TALK) 05:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

AuthorityOfOne is a new user who posted factual and neutral content with several verifiable references. Security2, Editorwatchdog7 and potentially Blpeditor3 are presumably the subject himself, or his colleagues/associates acting on his behalf. They have removed this factual content by claiming libel. But more probably because they do not like the content itself. The content conforms to the "Biographies Of Living Persons" policy in that it is a Neutral Point Of View, it is Verifiable, and it is Not Original Research. Because one does not like a biographical fact, does not make it untrue. In fact, the subject claims to be 'notable', however an internet search of the subject's full name results in only seven results (at the time of this writing), with the top three relating to the removed content, and only one relating to his profession and company, which are the predominant topics of the Wikipedia article.

If there is a concern that the content is not a "Neutral Point Of View", please make suggestions on how to edit the content.

"Wikipedia is not censored". AuthorityOfOne (talk) 14:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Adding references: http://articles.dailypress.com/1991-09-27/news/9109270109_1_credit-card-theft-bank-cards-theft-and-fraud http://articles.dailypress.com/1990-08-07/news/9008070105_1_credit-card-theft-card-fraud-perkins-home http://wasdmz2.courts.state.va.us/CJISWeb/MainMenu.do (Select Williamsburg Circuit Court, Search "Last Name, First Name") AuthorityOfOne (talk) 14:37, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

AuthorityOfOne has initiated contact to both Security2 and Blpeditor3 in order to resolve disputed edits. As of this writing, these editors have not responded. The assumption is that Security2 and Blpeditor3 are one-time user accounts for the purpose of removing content, with no interest in verifying the content, or discussing the edits. AuthorityOfOne (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I don't think these are all the same person (there's a diff where one undoes another's edit) but something is up, so I'm endorsing. I also think that the Bayanarski case may be a factor here, so I'll endorse to figure it out. (To the CU - Bayanarski isn't stale, I don't think, so we should be able to check there.) —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Two groups here that are ❌ to each other:
 * Group 1 (✅):
 * Group 2 (✅):
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Group 2 (✅):
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 13:34, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * All blocked. - F ASTILY  (TALK) 18:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've updated the tags, but I've asked Tnxman to clarify these accounts' connections to Banayarski. Leaving it open 'til that happens. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:13, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Closing for now; relist as necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:00, 3 August 2011 (UTC)