Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Blue Mango Juice/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy M01 resulted in redirecting Samsung Galaxy M01 to Samsung Galaxy M series. My edit was reverted by the page creator. 's first action was to revert me again just three minutes after registering their account. WP:QUACK. Not wanting to tread into involved territory, I would like to have an uninvolved admin take a look. ✗ plicit  12:46, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * I agree with Explicit, I filed a similar report with Twinkle before seeing it was already filed. Not much to add in terms of evidence, this is a duck. Pika voom  Talk 13:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Same here. I, too, submitted a report then saw that it had already been done.  Quack.  --David Biddulph (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is so incredibly blatant that I was tempted to request CU to rule out a joe-job, but it's the same edit-summary style, and consistent with BMJ's attitude toward this AfD to date. Strictly speaking they can be indeffed for block evasion, given that they've edited after their sock was indeffed, but this is a first offense, and falls into the category I think of as "Person thinks they invented sockpuppetry", for which a short tempblock is often enough to scare someone straight, so I'd rather not throw the book at them just yet. : —3 days for the socking, 7 for the disruptive editing and incivility the sock engaged in. (Without prejudice against the consideration of longer blocks based on their overall pattern of edits.) --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 05:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅ Sro23 (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

New editor's first edit was to ask at the Teahouse about using a new account when their IP was blocked for sockpuppetry. Shares an interest in Samsung smartphones with Blue Mango Juice. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - -- RoySmith (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ✅, as is Mali9272 from the archives, and also  The kind folks at The Teahouse are giving out bad advice :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
Recreating images previously deleted by the various socks, with the exact same image. Because of WP:BEANS, I won't get more specific. The existing socks are likely stale, but maybe there's enough info in the logs. Yamla (talk) 11:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments



 * This is based in information in the cu wiki and is based on more than just a matching IP address range. Additionally, I took into account the behavioural evidence from the editor interaction analyser, see vs Logo Editor, vs ThePremiumBoy, and vs GoldenHayato. Will tag and block. --Yamla (talk) 11:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)