Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bniejadlik/Archive

07 September 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

The contribution history in the article Vayama reveals many promotional edits, some made by obvious socks (Teamvayama and OfficialVayama, who are blocked) and others made by not-so-obvious socks including the IP addresses listed above. I list as the sockmaster because that is the earliest-created account (from 28 November 2006). This account has a short list of contributions all suggesting a WP:SPA related to the travel agency business.

The only account listed above that doesn't appear to be an SPA is Funandtrvl, which has an extensive and apparently constructive contribution history, and was created just a few days after the alleged sockmaster Bniejadlik. Funandtrvl made only a minor edit to Vayama. The apparent close association of the username with the topic led me to list it as well, although I doubt there's any association. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:35, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  21:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC) I don't see the case, and in particular Funandtrvl, who has almost 96k edits here. I can't fathom endorsing CU for this. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 21:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * - as only two accounts are not stale..Funandtrvl and OfficialVayama and there isn't any evidence to make a case for a connection there.
 * This is just too stale, with the master's last edits coming in well over 3 years ago and the link to Funandtrvl being way to weak to consider. Others are blocked or way past editing.  Nothing to really be accomplished here, CU is impossible regardless, closing. Dennis Brown -  2&cent;    &copy;   Join WER 13:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)