Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bob the angry flower/Archive

27 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Two named accounts created 20 minutes from each other. Both accounts have only been used to make the same edits, trying to say that "Eskimo" is not an offensive term, to Eskimo and to agree with each other on Talk:Eskimo. The IP made these edits:, , ,.

The IP then deleted her/his edits, to be restored 4 minutes later by the newly created User:Bob the angry flower:.

Then this edit was reverted, it was then restored by the also newly created User:Artanajuat:, and once again. Then the two accounts had a delightful conversation backing each other up at Talk:Eskimo. Uyvsdi (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Was going to start this but already started so please add in who has just reverted to the above users version. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 23:22, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:25, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Endorsing check on named accounts per behavioral evidence. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * with respect to James More ison - no evidence has been presented.
 * Bob the angry flower and Artanajuat are ✅ matches to one another. . ​—DoRD (talk)​ 14:31, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeffed sock and blocking master 48 hours. Associated IPs used by those accounts have been autoblocked. Closing.