Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bobwalsky/Archive

Evidence submitted by Jimsteele9999
Article (Shane Salerno) was dormant for some time, then activity of two users appear, almost identical. May be coincidence, but the article is of low importance and therefore it seems unlikely two users would take interest in editing the same page with the same MO. CU needed since both accounts are not anon even though WP:DUCK seems to apply. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Auto-generated every six hours.
 * User compare report

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
I don't see any alternate account abuse here. Have you asked the users about the situation? TN X Man 14:43, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * No, it's been from my experience in suspected sock cases asking the users involved is not the best (e.g. reliable) course of action. I was hoping a CU could put this to bed faster. Thanks. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 21:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * - A bit stale (not ), and they may well be friends in RL or whatnot. Unless there is additional activity, I'm not minded to take any action at this time. T. Canens (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * No action taken at this time. Nakon  23:10, 25 November 2010 (UTC)