Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bokan995/Archive

24 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Usernames, contributions, timing, reverting the same editor. I would like a CU as I'd also like a check of who has been suspected of being a sock/meat puppet and although I'm not including him here he should be checked (maybe I should have included him for this, but I'm uncertain. Dougweller (talk) 20:02, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ the following are the same:
 * TN X Man 20:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Only did stuff quickly here, blocked 2 socks, is autoblocked. Open to actions on the master, which I didn't look into. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  21:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll assume some good faith and let the master off with a warning for now. Relist as necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Only did stuff quickly here, blocked 2 socks, is autoblocked. Open to actions on the master, which I didn't look into. --  DQ  (t)   (e)  21:40, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll assume some good faith and let the master off with a warning for now. Relist as necessary. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 02:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

27 August 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Contributions & geolocates to the same location (at least as the IP sock in the previous case). If it is agreed that this is a sock of Bokan995, note that he wasn't blocked before - I believe the Administrator missed this edit which shows him backing one of his sock puppet's edits, so the earlier sock puppetry was clearly intentional. Dougweller (talk) 10:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Added another one. Black Kite (t)
 * Another link showing Bokan referring to a sock.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dougweller (talk • contribs) 12:02, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * . I've blocked per WP:DUCK, but I'm endorsing for sleepers, confirmation to previous accounts (e.g. Ono2) and to see if we can get an IP block here. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * This appears to be ✅; I don't see any new accounts, and unfortunately an IP block does not appear to be practical here. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:34, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Enough is enough. Sock master blocked indef as repeat offender. Favonian (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

04 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Pretty obvious clues (see puppets) as well as contributions, - if I hadn't been involved in reverting his edits I'd block him myself. Dougweller (talk) 20:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Blocked and tagged per WP:DUCK. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 22:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)