Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bolhones/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
In July 2023, was blocked in the Portuguese Wikipedia for sockpuppetry. The confirmed accounts were, , and. Bolhones, Nautilo, and Bilhauano are. The only account which made a few edits in the last 90 days was CarlyleShom, therefore I request the account to be checked with CarlyleShom, a confirmed sockpuppet of Bolhones, because of the following requests:


 * These accounts are all illegitimate sockpuppets according to WP:ILLEGIT. Undisclosed alternative accounts are not supposed to "be used in discussions internal to the project outside of limited circumstance", nor to avoiding scrutiny. For this reason, I also request the block of the accounts previously confirmed in Portuguese Wikipedia (Bilhauano, Nautilo, and CarlyleShom).


 * Kimbler's behaviour resembles the other Bolhones' accounts.


 * It is an old account which has edited a few times, but mostly in AfD discussions, with a remarkable deletionist point of view. Kimbler vs. Bilhauno.


 * They are contumacious POV-pushers in AfDs about Brazilian aristocracy. The earliest edit of Kimbler was a commentary supporting the deletion of the page Pedro Luiz of Orléans-Braganza, while Bolhones supported the deletion of Prince Pedro Carlos of Orléans-Braganza.


 * Their edits in the Portuguese Wikipedia also resembles Bolhones. Same summary: Kimbler, Bolhones ('PE', which means 'AfD', with a hyperlink).

RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


 * The other accounts are not stale in the Portuguese Wikipedia and a CheckUser has been performed on them. Is it possible to contact pt.wiki checks to compare the checkuser data and confirm whether the accounts are related or not? RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I have looked on our centralised checkuser wiki but found no data and as such I suspect that it wasn't kept after checking the accounts.
 * Therefore, I suggest making a WP:SPI request on ptwiki for Kimbler and seeing if there is a better link on that wiki. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 09:24, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Dreamy Jazz, Portuguese Wikipedia checkuser Albertoleoncio has said all data are located on the checkwiki, and that you can find it. RodRabelo7 (talk) 16:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Nope I cannot find it. All that is there is behavioural evidence as to why a check was justified. No actual results from the CU tool. Furthermore, it is all in portuguese (a language I cannot read) so I've had to use google translate to understand what it means. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 19:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:13, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ to each other:


 * The account geolocates to the same city as the confirmed accounts.
 * is definitely (ran a check to make sure). Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 21:18, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Kimbler relation does not seem clear cut, but I have no doubt the rest of accounts are the same person. They are stale, but feel free to report again if they come back to English Wikipedia with more than one account. . MarioGom (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)