Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BonheurFDS/Archive

06 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Blatant ducks, defacing articles about Turkish people, and all are blocked. But I notice that the latest, Soundwipe, was registered the same day as Houratear, before Houratear was blocked, so I'm requesting CheckUser to see if there are any more sleepers. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Yeah, a sleeper check would probably be beneficial here.  Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  19:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And how. ✅ the following are the same:
 * TN X Man 19:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged, so we're all done here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  20:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 19:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged, so we're all done here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  20:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 19:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged, so we're all done here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  20:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * TN X Man 19:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * All accounts have been blocked and tagged, so we're all done here. Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  20:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

24 July 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

We recently had a vandal posting anti-Turkish abuse on various articles and removing images of Turkish people, and they had a whole nest of sockpuppets. This one has just turned up and vandalised two of the same articles, here and here - one made an image very small, the other was a blatant anti-Turk insult. As there were so many socks last time, I'm requesting CheckUser to look for more sleepers. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Also this edit is vandalism too - the match was against France, not Turkey (I've fixed it now) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

(Sorry, I created this under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User:BonheurFDS rather than Sockpuppet investigations/BonheurFDS. Not sure how best to move it without messing up the existing Sockpuppet investigations/BonheurFDS, so can someone please fix it up?)
 * Can anyone else see the typo here, because I can't see it. –MuZemike 09:42, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It shouldn't have the "User:" part -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:51, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅ along with:



Given, they're all editing from Tiscali, but the users whom I blocked have identical editing patterns. –MuZemike 09:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I've fixed this case not to have the User: in front of it. We're done here anyway. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

02 December 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

This is a definite I think. This user has vandalised the Mehmet Osman page where he/she keeps removing the image or making it small (17px). The users that have done this before has had many socks. GSorby – Ping!   09:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * The name fits too - I seem to remember his previous vandalism of articles related to Turks was claimed to be retaliation for a crisis in his love life -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:38, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, and considering the mass of sleepers the first time round, I'd suggest a Checkuser to see if there are any more -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * He's confessed on my Talk page - blocked and tagged -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:59, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Would still recommend a Checkuser though - massive sleeper attack was his previous MO -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:03, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Pretty sure the master and their socks are stale, but it can't hurt to see if there are any other accounts related to LoveHasComeAround. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Given the behavioral evidence and the data from the CU logs, I would say that LoveHasComeAround is a pretty much a ✅ match. Didn't see any other accounts though. Elockid  ( Talk ) 02:23, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

21 May 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I know it's been a few years since BonheurFDS's last SPI, but Superiormarket has made edits similar to those made by BonheurFDS in the past - compare these diffs, both making an attempt to remove the same image, both making very similar edit summaries. E.P. Rickhardt has also done this type of thing here (I tagged this account as a suspected sockpuppet already). Leatherbridge FM has been blocked as a sockpuppet of Superiormarket, as they have both made similar edits both claiming that one actress (Jaqueline Jossa) has won an award that another actress (Michelle Keegan) has won. Requesting checkuser because there have been many of them in the past, and are probably others. – anemone projectors – 20:02, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - Blocked Rickhardt as a duck, endorsing for sleeper check. ( X! ·  talk )  · @890  · 20:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The following are ✅ matches to one another:
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As it turns out, I blocked several of these accounts last month for trolling and/or vandalism, but couldn't determine who they were. Obviously, the master and previous socks are all stale, but CU logs show that they were in the same location and using the same ISP as these accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 20:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Tags and reblocks all around, everyone linked now. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 22:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)