Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BounceBounceBounce/Archive

27 November 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The unregistered user, together with have edited the following User sandboxes. The users themselves have, in some cases, cross-edited each other's sandbox WP:FAKEARTICLES.

All articles have been edited by the IPs shortly after the creation of the User and Sandbox. All articles are similar. They have been reported to WP:MFD. The articles are not authentic copies of the actual live articles. They are highly derivative and contain erroneous material relating to living people. I'm not sure that CU evidence is needed in such a clear case. Leaky Caldron  13:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

This appears to be possibly related to Sockpuppet investigations/FlabbyLiam. The sandbox material is similar, and one of the user names matches the *Liam naming. -- Whpq (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - --  DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  20:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * To quote ReaperEternal on the other SPI " I Confirmed enough accounts to each other to confirm this is all one person." Without technical evidence to back it up, I think Whpq is correct that these are related. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  21:12, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Master and all socks tagged and blocked indef, contribs nuked. Closing now. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:30, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

11 December 2013

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Strongly suspected of being associated with this recent case based on user name format and type of sandbox editing involving reality TV. If so, it will, inter alia, be related to Sockpuppet investigations/FlabbyLiam, a sockmaster with dozens of socks. Leaky Caldron  17:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - needing sleeper check. Rschen7754 04:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks pretty . There are no unblocked accounts that I can see, so I'm closing this case. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:34, 13 December 2013 (UTC)