Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Braveheart5050/Archive

08 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

I have blocked both of the above editors already for passing the duck test.

Examples include : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mo_Harris&diff=prev&oldid=620261411

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mo_Harris&diff=prev&oldid=616342547

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raintheone&diff=prev&oldid=620262309

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raintheone&diff=prev&oldid=617295933

I understand Checkuser has already been performed so any sleepers will have already been blocked. I have raised this for reference only in case any future accounts are created. 5 albert square (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Note I've also blocked as a ✅ sock of . Everything is tagged, so I'm closing.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots  18:54, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

18 August 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Making similar edits to similar pages. There is consensus at WP:EE not to include relatives that the characters have not had a scene with. This is to stop the infobox becoming too cluttered. However both accounts are making these types of edits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mo_Harris&diff=prev&oldid=616492700

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Slater&diff=prev&oldid=621667624

Requesting CU to see if these two accounts are related and to see if there are any sleepers. 5 albert square (talk) 00:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  03:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The technical evidence is inconclusive, though based on geolocation it remains . Behavioural evidence will need to be the deciding factor in this case.--Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:12, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeffing sock and closing.