Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BrianBeahr/Archive

Evidence submitted by Jevansen

 * Sock 1 - Creates a template with just his third edit. You'd think a "newbie" would have a little more difficulty. All other edits have related to the St Kilda Football Club and follow the same style as BrianBeahr - Long and unnecessary section headings - Fascination with minor premierships - Bizarre edit summaries etc
 * Sock 2 - His preferred sock. Hundreds of edits identical in style to Brian but outed himself in this edit to an article of a town with a population of just 15,000 people. Also the home town of BrianBeahr as evident by his prolific editing of the article as well as this and this. Username is presumably named after the nearby Mount Baw Baw.
 * Sock 3 - Only just created, after his other socks were accused of being BrianBeahr. Exactly the same edits as those above. Jevansen (talk) 08:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
✅:



All confirmed by syllogism as BrianBeahr. Also, –MuZemike 09:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Christ, that was easy.... expected this to go on for days like an AfD. Thanks mate. Jevansen (talk) 09:05, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, I think I got them all; I missed two that were right in front of me. –MuZemike 09:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

All already tagged; closing -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 12:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

23 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Brand new S/P Accounts creating marginal notability navbox templates related to St Kilda Football Club or regions which match with other related sock edits (if that makes sense) e.g.. This is identical modus operandi to multiple earlier confirmed socks. It is not conceivable that a newbie editor would be making such edits anyway. Username with a 1 suffix seems to be a common thread also. Moondyne (talk) 14:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Commment: Huggins1 does seem to be inactive at the moment. Moondyne (talk) 14:54, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Unfortunately, all of the other accounts are. The reviewing admin will need to decide this based on behavior. TN X Man 15:19, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I've blocked and tagged Heritage on behavioral grounds. As a side note, I've deleted Alistair Smith for a second time; the first time it was deleted per PROD, but it had been edted by Beahr. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 00:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)