Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brianfbenton/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Curous if they are related or not since the alleged sock claims they were not paid, yet the master surely is since they have contributed the longest and have now taken over within a month by contributing to the main article, Daniel Burnett. Summaries are also considerably similar ("Linked Dr. Burnett's page to that of his company" vs "Created a page for Dr. Daniel Burnett". Alleged sock's contributions go back to 2015 on similar subjects so that also suggests they were paid. SwisterTwister   talk  05:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Checkuser comment These two accounts are socks: They both also have a very strong whiff of UPE, and I suggest reviewing all of their limited edits. Risker (talk) 13:24, 7 August 2017 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Blocking master 72 hours and indeffing the sock with tag. I've removed a bit of promotion and there doesn't appear to be much of anything in article space. Closing.