Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bricks10/Archive

Evidence submitted by Fabrictramp
has been removing sources and critical content from Philip Bloom for several months, and after warnings I blocked him/her for a month on January 1. On January 5, 's first two edits were to restore Bricks10's edits to Philip Bloom, and his/her second two edits were to 's talk page, another editor who has been reverting the content blanking.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  14:43, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users
Perhaps this is of some interest? Lord Spongefrog,  (I am Czar of all Russias!)  15:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
If Activist posts on Bricks10's user talk, it gives me doubts about sock puppetry. Perhaps they're working closely together, though. –MuZemike 20:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Bricks10 says they are not the same person in this edit, and I'm happy to AGF and believe that they are two different people working closely together. For the present it might be moot, as both have stopped removing sourced content from the article in question.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  22:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Closing with no action. Nathan  T 22:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)