Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brokeradar222/Archive

28 February 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

''Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters " ~ "''

All are making similar edits to the Ian Erix article. I think there is a conflict of interest (either via the subject or management), and the goal is to fluff up the article. I believe the history smells bad enough already, but I hope that CheckUser can, by proving me wrong, restore my faith in humanity. See also Articles for deletion/Ian Erix. Drmies (talk) 19:24, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - My guess is that they're meatpuppets, but CU can confirm that for us. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 19:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅, Tiptoety  talk 20:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Both socks blocked and tagged; master blocked 24h for socking. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 20:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)