Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brownstownbeast/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Named account is a self-styled "fact-checker" with an apparent grudge against Theresa Flores, resulting in lots of WP:OR and WP:SYN (see the article's talk page).

After a failed attempt to delete the article, the named account decided to simply remove the incident that is Flores' main motivation.

Having been previously warned about WP:BLP violations on their talk page and the article's talk page, the editor is now editing logged out to again remove the incident and has apparently decided to become a "new" editor at the article. Sum mer PhD v2.0 16:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry but you are incorrect. I have only ever had one account with Wikipedia.  I only got the account to by pass protections and be granted certain privileges.  Now being that I am a new user there are times when I have fallen back on the old habit of editing without first logging into my account.  Much like I use google sometimes without logging into my google accounts.  In fact, not logging in is seriously inefficient.  Please read this carefully.  Never did I not log on to bypass something.  Infact I became a registered user to contribute to articles that have some form of protection.  There has never been another account used by me and there never will be.  I will however delete things that are not properly sourced and this article on Theresa Flores that is heavily edited by someone who knows her personally if full of claims that are not verifiable.  There is no actual official documentation to her being in Michigan.  No school records, police records, yearbook photos or anything. And nothing other then her word about being trafficked.  The reason why I have demanded the page be deleted is because I believe it either all has to be sacred or none of it can be sacred.  If her story is to sacred to criticize than it should also be to pure to be in print. That is why I am in favor of the article being deleted today, will be in favor of it being deleted tomorrow and the rest of the days.  Brownstownbeast (talk) 18:10, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * I won't call this sockpuppetry. There are only two pages that were edited by both the IP and Brownstownbeast: on Talk:Theresa Flores the user posted logged-out, and then signed his post properly 44 seconds later; on Theresa Flores the user made one series of 5 logged-out edits in a span of 6 minutes (probably forgot to log in). I see no intention to mislead. Case closed.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)  Vanjagenije   (talk)  22:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)