Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bubbles1452/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
potion sandbox vandal. There may be a 2-year old banned account to link these to. UtherSRG (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * is ✅ and clearly related per Special:PageHistory/1943 in China. . There's one potential sleeper, but I'm not confident enough to block. No obvious master visible, and I'm not sure it matters that much. Closing. --Blablubbs (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
More vandalism at potion and the teahouse. UtherSRG (talk) 01:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅ for all it really matters (which isn't much here). Closing. firefly  ( t · c ) 08:16, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets
These two are older vandals of the potion article. They quack the same as Bubbles. CU on these with Bubbles and the one I just recently tagged, please, and reorg to whomever is the oldest, right? UtherSRG (talk) 01:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU - the accounts are . One is already blocked and the other has not edited in over a year, so I don't think there's anything more to do here. Spicy (talk) 01:55, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * My point is that one of them should probably be tagged as the main, and the others as socks. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @UtherSRG: For vandalsocks like these, I don't really see the benefit in "sock taxonomy"; they're unsophisticated vandalism-only accounts, and can be blocked as such. I don't think there's much utility in tagging them, or in moving the case around whenever we find a slightly older one; it might even be counterproductive (see WP:DENY). --Blablubbs (talk) 15:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)