Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CNGLITCHINFO/Archive

Evidence submitted by Treelo
Another vandal who just cannot keep themselves from saying "lookit me" and doing a little jig for the admins. First popped up (to my knowledge) as CNGLITCHINFO and reappeared as two other identities shortly afterwards, all were blocked through an informal CU through ANI but odd that someone would come a little later and state we got the sockpuppeteer account wrong though CNGLITCHINFO was created (and blocked) several days before Tdinoahfan was even created. Obvious WP:DUCK I know but it's the CU results I'm more interested in, it's clear they'll pop up again to start over so a sweep for sleepers and active accounts and see if the IP can't be blocked for a spell. treelo radda  11:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The anon's recent edits to Long-term abuse/Scibaby seem extremely odd, I feel that there's a likelihood there may be no relation between the IP and the sockpuppets but my confidence isn't high in that regard.  treelo  radda  21:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

CheckUser requests
Requested by treelo  radda  11:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

MuZemike 20:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

 * ✅ as:
 * . Brandon (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * . Brandon (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * . Brandon (talk) 22:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Conclusions
Thewtfchronicles' block extended to indef as a confirmed sock puppet, all other accounts appropriately tagged. MuZemike 17:05, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Checker Fred
User:Clfan91 is believed to be a sock. Editing styles are they same. Keeps reverting. Same tone of typing.Checker Fred (talk) 22:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Clfan91 blocked as a duck. If the IP is attached it'll be caught by the auto-block. (please note: I removed some accounts from the Suspected sockpuppets list as they had already been blocked in a previous case) SpitfireTally-ho! 22:43, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Saylaveer
In this edit here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Phineas_and_Ferb_(season_2)&diff=386816403&oldid=371929867. This person uses the same type of tone in the edit. Just want to check. Saylaveer (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties
See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments
Moved from Sockpuppet investigations/411connor.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 23:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

All sockpuppets and CNGLITCHINFO are.  E lockid  ( Talk ) 23:59, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think there's enough to block here...almost zero overlap in articles edited, and I see that kind of tone all the time. T. Canens (talk) 04:36, 26 September 2010 (UTC)