Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CaeserKaiser/Archive

08 June 2014

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

This one is pretty straightforward. User:Minohaha, a fairly new Wikipedia editor, recently moved a page (2013 Egyptian coup d'état) without consensus. After it was moved back, Minohaha created a move request discussion on the Talk page to solicit input. So far, so good, right? Except then an IP editor with no history of edits and two brand-new editors popped up like clockwork to support the movereq:   The syntax is identical -- a telltale space between the last word in each sentence and the punctuation mark. None of the three editors used the word "support" typically used in movereq discussions, which isn't damning in and of itself, but is suspicious in context. The two registered accounts parrot Minohaha's distinct anti-Morsi, pro-Sisi bias. In conclusion, quack, quack, quack. Kudzu1 (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * And another IP editor, even after I placed a notice for this SPI in the movereq discussion. Syntax is again identical, with the paragraph written being a run-on sentence punctuated only by commas and ending with a space before the period. Non-standard spelling "Mursi" is the same as used by Leon783, too. -Kudzu1 (talk) 17:18, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * And another one. Worth noting Minohaha has responded, both denying that he is using other accounts and attempting to change up some of his linguistic tics (mostly by inserting some exclamation points here and there and closing the space between the end of his sentence/paragraph and the period). I don't believe him, but it's not my call -- just presenting evidence. -Kudzu1 (talk) 23:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

This exchange on Talk:2013 Egyptian coup d'état is another eyebrow-raiser, with 41.238.151.4 jumping into a debate between Minohaha and User:Kndimov and Minohaha then chiming in to "strongly agree" with 151.4. -Kudzu1 (talk) 00:45, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users
currently Egyptians inside Egypt can not talk (except in pro-Sissi language), but perhaps wise Egyptians outside Egypt or wise other people from allover the globe can talk.--Ashashyou (talk) 02:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

They can talk, they can express themselves as they want, but most of the people is supporting Sisi so that's why you think so (Minohaha (talk) 13:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC))

This looks very suspicious indeed. Leon783 (contributions), Henry Matthew (contributions), and 41.238.156.252 (contributions) have all joined June 7-8 and have done nothing but Strongly Agree with the arguments presented by Minohaha. Ashashyou brings up a good point above, those who oppose Sisi have a tendency to go to jail these days, labelled as terrorists and Muslim Brotherhood supporters. -- Kndimov (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * The following accounts are a ✅ match to each other:
 * Technically speaking, these accounts do not seem to be related to . As usual, no comment with respect to the IP addresses mentioned. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved, fixed, blocked, leaving Minohaha. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  03:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Technically speaking, these accounts do not seem to be related to . As usual, no comment with respect to the IP addresses mentioned. Salvio Let's talk about it! 16:10, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved, fixed, blocked, leaving Minohaha. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  03:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Moved, fixed, blocked, leaving Minohaha. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  03:37, 18 June 2014 (UTC)