Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CafecitodeStarbucks/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets
On the page Carlos Hank Rhon, I added sourced info that link Hank Rhon to the Mexican organized crime and other controversial info. The user CafecitodeStarbucks erased it all pretending all accusations had been dismissed (I have not found a source that could back this up). I restored everything and added more sources and more info. CafecitodeStarbucks changed his attitude and pretended to play along, and 10 minutes later, Stella120987 deleted again everything pretending that I had misread the sources and that the content is defamatory. Comparing the contributions of CafecitodeStarbucks and Stella120987 make it obvious that the same person is handling those two accounts, probably an editor paid directly or indirectly by Hank Rhon. Yelobluread (talk) 04:23, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Comments by other users

 * Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * -  Girth Summit  (blether)  10:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ✅ to one another:
 * They are all editing the same articles, in a blatant bad-faith attempt to evade scrutiny. On the same IP is another account which looks identical:
 * It has not edited the same articles, and there is a gap in their editing, but the only edits it has made appear to be to COATRACK negative information about a trade unionist into a bunch of articles, so I conclude that it is very likely the same person - that one I will also block.
 * Finally, I'll note that I have my own concerns about the content that has been added to that article - it does not appear to me to be written in an appropriate encyclopedic tone, and it looks like it is making assertions of fact about criminal activities where there has been no conviction. I'm going to refer that to WP:BLPN to get some more eyes on it. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * They are all editing the same articles, in a blatant bad-faith attempt to evade scrutiny. On the same IP is another account which looks identical:
 * It has not edited the same articles, and there is a gap in their editing, but the only edits it has made appear to be to COATRACK negative information about a trade unionist into a bunch of articles, so I conclude that it is very likely the same person - that one I will also block.
 * Finally, I'll note that I have my own concerns about the content that has been added to that article - it does not appear to me to be written in an appropriate encyclopedic tone, and it looks like it is making assertions of fact about criminal activities where there has been no conviction. I'm going to refer that to WP:BLPN to get some more eyes on it. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Finally, I'll note that I have my own concerns about the content that has been added to that article - it does not appear to me to be written in an appropriate encyclopedic tone, and it looks like it is making assertions of fact about criminal activities where there has been no conviction. I'm going to refer that to WP:BLPN to get some more eyes on it. Girth Summit  (blether)  10:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)