Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Calore123/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

No one is supporting "Pakistani victory" or "both sides claimed victory", for over 2 weeks, since the discussion was initiated at Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, except these two accounts. At first Calore123 made attacks on ethnicity and was blocked by Drmies. Since that block, Calore123 has attempted to get results changed but failed and received zero support. Surprisingly, a new account (Acnologia0) shows up to make same opinion as Calore123 on Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, with both users claiming that the war was "inconclusive" and even on Talk:Battle of Chawinda, where Calore123 had commented only a few minutes ago. My Lord (talk) 09:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
✅, blocked, tagged,, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:15, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Appeared from no where to revert the results on Battle of Chawinda, Kargil War and Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 which includes blanket revert without edit summary. Has used https://www.dw.com/en/why-neither-india-nor-pakistan-won-the-1965-war/a-18677930 as source on talk page. Orientls (talk) 09:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

I agree that it is worth a CheckUser as this account was only really interested in cricket related articles. Their sudden arrival at the Indo-Pakistani conflict does raise suspicion. --RaviC (talk) 08:21, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * If sockpuppetry really is going on here, we will eventually want to rename the SPI after the oldest account (Anzan7). Renaming right now, however, would be confusing, since there is an archive page for Calore123, and said archive page doesn't mention Anzan7.  —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * for CU — but reminding everyone (just in case) that edit-warring on deeply divisive topics could possibly involve multiple, independent editors belonging to a single ethnic / political / religious faction, and not necessarily a single editor engaged in sockpuppetry; or, stated another way, the accounts in question could represent separate individual members of the same subspecies of WP:DUCK, rather than a single individual duck. —  Rich wales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Anzan7 appears to be ❌. - Mailer Diablo 13:09, 30 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Closing with no action. Sro23 (talk) 01:50, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

When I saw the talk page of Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1965, I saw only one user has protested against the "Indian victory" on this article and that is Calore123.

I read the SPI and found the similarities mentioned in the past to be recurring now but with this new account (Knightrises10) which was created only 6 days after Calore123 made final edit in 4 July.


 * This URL is used by both: dw.com/en/why-neither-india-nor-pakistan-won-the-1965-war/a-18677930
 * Both edit warring on Indo-Pakistan War of 1965, शिव साहिल/Shiv Sahil (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
— Berean Hunter   (talk)  16:32, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Behaviour isn't suspect enough for a block.  QEDK ( 後  ☕  桜 ) 13:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)