Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Calvinci/Archive

17 March 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Suspected sockpuppet of banned user Calvinci. Username link and also commented a response to the blocking of Calvinci at within 10 minutes of registration. &#8213; Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 19:07, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Obvious sockpuppetry is obvious. (1) User names: Calvincilives was created 2 days after Calvinci is indeffed . (2) First edit  is made at Talk:Calvinci, continuing the last discussion that Calvinci was engaged in with the same attitude and abusive language. I've requested checkuser because I suspect we are going to have to play whack-a-mole with this puppeteer. Let's get the IP data up front! Skyerise (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. Admin needed to block. I don't see a need for CU. What do you mean by "let's get the IP data up front"? You know that CU may not reveal IPs. By the way, Calvinci's IP is pretty clear from this edit.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  21:04, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know IP data doesn't get revealed. It does sometimes get filed for future checkuser reference, I understand. Though I guess that's just hearsay and I know nothing about the CU process for certain. I forgot about that IP edit... Skyerise (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2015 (UTC)