Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Camparkcamera/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Evidence COI/promotional editing in Action_camera (page history). The sockmaster, as the username also suggests, has made promotional edits about Campark.
 * Sockmaster 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
 * Duck 1 2 (Different article: Sport (camera)) 3 (Different article: Sport (camera)) 4 5
 * User claims copyright to following images: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 * Duck 1 2
 * Duck 1
 * Duck 1 2 (Different article: Sport (camera))1]

Others to Consider (poor evidence to suspect socking to master, but editors adding brand names to Action camera; included suspected relationships amongst them if any)
 * 1 (added the name of another Chinese-based action camera company SJCAM; however, may not be a sock because SJCAM and Campark appear to be competitors in the same industry)
 * 1 (BEhD)
 * 1 ("Waterproof")
 * 1 ("Waterproof") -- seems possible to Hifly213.
 * 1 (ENRG "Epicam")
 * 1 (ENRG "Epicam") -- seems possible to Kruthikp
 * 1 (review site)
 * 1 (review site)
 * 1 (Sony)

--JustBerry (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''
 * Hm... regarding edit by here. User hyperlinks Campark in a series of action camera examples, after which the user mentions "These later developed new things will bring revolutionary changes to our life." Also, included accounts to consider in the evidence section above. However, per WP:NOTFISHING and DUCK/possible accounts above, checking for sleepers (on the master or DUCKs) may be worthwhile instead. Requesting clerk to consider requesting and endorsing CU check.  --JustBerry (talk) 22:02, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Per User:Champion/CSD_log/Archive_1 (permalink), appears to be the creator of Campark action camera (deleting sysop: ). --JustBerry (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Pinging deleting sysops of Campark regarding a) if they noticed similar article creation (or behavior in general) from other accounts and b) article creators of both deleted versions of the article. --JustBerry (talk) 22:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP is inactive. Users are blocked. Tagging and closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:39, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Reopening for more evidence per IRC. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 21:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * What is the status of this case?--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)


 * - I'm going to cautiously endorse a check here. This is a full endorsement only as to the master, Hifly213, and Sabbir antor. If there's a smoking gun that pops out if you check those accounts, the others might be worth following up on, of course. Thanks, Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 20:46, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The following accounts are ❌:
 * Sabbir antor is . I did not check any already-blocked accounts, even if not stale, except Camparkcamera.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 01:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sabbir antor is . I did not check any already-blocked accounts, even if not stale, except Camparkcamera.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 01:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sabbir antor is . I did not check any already-blocked accounts, even if not stale, except Camparkcamera.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Closing. Kevin ( aka L235 ·&#32; t ·&#32; c) 01:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC)