Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Campycipro/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

SPAs created by master in violation of their block in order to restore their version of a page. Master account seemingly has some AGF edits, hence I wouldn't indeff the master at this stage, but the Crewayers sock needs to be blocked. Their other sock is already indeffed. I have left a notice on the master's Talk page. — kashmīrī  TALK  10:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Both socks blocked. I might have indef-blocked the master, but 's comment above makes sense, so I'll just make a small increase in the block length as a warning, with an explanatory note on the talk page. JBW (talk) 10:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Seems I was wrong in assuming good faith - the master wilfully ignores the advice. Here, another sock, this time created after the master was explained sockpuppetry and given a chance. — kashmīrī  TALK  12:27, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure. Just it helps to monitor socking when all sock accounts are properly tagged - the tag will then add all the socks to a single automatic category. — kashmīrī  TALK  13:33, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep, the master doesn't yet have the tag. I know it takes additional time that is always short, but (also thanks to automated categories) it will make it easier in the future to link the users and cases. —  kashmīrī  TALK  16:39, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - obvious . Please block the sock indefinitely and upgrade the master's block to an indef for abusing multiple accounts. Given that this happened after an explanation was given to them, and that they've been blocked three times now, I believe that's the only way to ensure that no further disruption happens. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 12:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , closing. Primefac (talk) 13:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Tweaked the tag slightly. Did you deliberately leave the block duration for the master as is? --Blablubbs&#124;talk 13:18, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * @Kashmiri It's no big deal, but could I ask you to leave sock tagging to clerks and administrators and bring up any concerns regarding tags at the SPI? It helps avoid confusion. Thanks. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 13:23, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I know – it's just that tagging is something usually left to clerks and administrators (see also the template documentation); it helps avoid confusion and accidental mistaken tagging – if you think someone was tagged (or left untagged) incorrectly, please feel free to ping us. Best, --Blablubbs&#124;talk 13:37, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I've tagged the master now that JBW has indeffed, but holding off was deliberate – we basically never tag accounts that are only blocked temporarily. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 16:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I... thought I did? Primefac (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hm, looks like it didn't go through – JBW got to it shortly after though. :) --Blablubbs&#124;talk 19:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Registered right after master blocked indefinitely, a few signals indicate it's the same person. — kashmīrī  TALK  08:14, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * ✅, already blocked, no further accounts visible at this time. ST47 (talk) 05:13, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , archiving. --Blablubbs&#124;talk 06:38, 31 May 2021 (UTC)