Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cannesfan/Archive

01 April 2012

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Possible violation of WP:3RR. Both have been active on the page for Jessica Chastain, usually making the same reverts within a short time of each other.

Diff 1: Diff 2: Diff 3: Diff 4: Diff 5: Shivertimbers433 (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * - I think there is more going on here than I can tell, because the two reported accounts and the reporter are all contributing to the one article, in what seems to be an SPA method, and that the reporter found SPI out of the blue seems odd too. But let's assume good faith and assume that the rules are being followed. That leaves us with some very convincing diffs, but the edit summary usage throws me off here as one uses it sometimes, the other doesn't use it at all; though with practically the same text being restored in multiple revisions, it's hard to ignore. -- DQ  (ʞlɐʇ)  10:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The two appear ❌. TN X Man  16:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)