Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cassandrathesceptic/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

As background, indeffed User:Cassandrathesceptic is named as the sockmaster here, though this individual has overwhelmingly edited using numerous IPs (largely in Greater Manchester, Lancashire and Yorkshire), with activities commencing two or three years before registering this named account. After the user name was registered, activity was still largely via IPs and these IP posts were not signed but were generally informally appended “Cassandra”; post-block activity is neither signed nor appended “Cassandra”. In addition to Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Cassandrathesceptic, pre-registration IPs can be found at Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of 92.5.15.139.

In regard to User:92.13.79.121, this recent post highlights an identical quote from the article and makes the same points about it as this archive post, informally signed “Cassandra”.

This is a favourite theme, which this user has raised numerous times at various articles, including whilst logged in:, , , ; , to name a few.

This post highlights an identical quote, though in a different article, to the initial post and subsequent thread [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Harrying_of_the_North#the_Anglicisation_of_the_Lowlands? here], all as informally-signed IPs.

This edit does not appear to echo any earlier themes, though it is at a talk page that the user has edited, logged in, in October 2016.

There is nothing definitive about or this edit but I’ll note that they, highly typically for this individual, address very old talk page posts in regard to long-resolved issues.

It is clearly the same blocked user. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP edits too old. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Can you clarify please? Only 5 days since the last activity, for an IP that has made a series of edits, several days apart, doesn't seem very old. Mutt Lunker (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets



 * Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

User has some history of harassing Mutt Lunker.

Sockpuppet investigations/Cassandrathesceptic/Archive Ostrichyearning3 (talk) 15:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * This is misfiled, SPI reports are filed under the name of the master. You also need to provide diffs as evidence. ST47 (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Just noting that I've merged Sockpuppet investigations/92.14.216.40 to here based on the crossover of interests. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * To note, I believe this to be a separate individual. See: Sockpuppet_investigations/92.14.216.40/Archive, which resulted in a block of this IP. Mutt Lunker (talk) 15:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)