Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Catherine Huebscher/Archive

02 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

was indefinitely blocked for personal attacks and WP:BLP violations and sockpuppetry on the Madonna (entertainer) related articles, especially W.E. The above IP started editing today, just only inserting negative reviews and blatantly copy pasting from sources, failing WP:PLAGIARISM. I had a hunch from the polished words that this must be a sock, since he/she seemed to know me. But was not able to place it, until now when I realised that it must be a sock of Catherine's after the IP started saying "Madona will have more chances of making successful films, this one has flopped" and seemed to be only interested in adding the negative reviews. I urged on, and just pestered by calling the IP as Catherine, to which I got a somewhat confession. So here it is. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 18:31, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I am not a sock puppet of anyone. And never "confessed anything." Legolas is now clearly on a vendetta. I have had problems editing any reviews of W.E. into the article since yesterday which was my introduction to wikipedia. I do not see why it has been so hard to edit fairly. I have been polite and actually kind to the user Legolas and they will not work with me and I have heard profanity from them. can someone please step in? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.237.119.134 (talk • contribs) 18:38, September 2, 2011


 * Really? So that's why you rapidly went to those users with whom Catherine was once acquitted and asked for their help? Its beyond fishy that a new user, who claims to have his/her first introduction to Wikipedia yesterday is suddenly so knowledgeable on core policies and editing. If you are not a sock, why the worry? Check user will clear everything. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 18:46, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * CU won't connect an account to an IP. Nevertheless, it's clear that the IP isn't at all new to Wikipedia, so I've blocked it for evasion. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 21:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

04 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Another case of WP:DUCK. Block evasion basically — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 09:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * IP blocked 2 weeks. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 16:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)


 * 69.237.118.0/23 blocked 2 weeks. –MuZemike 17:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

07 September 2011

 * Suspected sockpuppets


 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

WP:DUCK. — Legolas ( talk 2 me ) 15:57, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Barek already blocked the IP for a bit. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 01:09, 8 September 2011 (UTC)