Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Catherinelie/Archive

11 February 2015

 * Suspected sockpuppets




 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

The original editor continued to attempt to add pics to THIS ARTICLE. Even though they were doing it incorrectly, they continued to disrupt the article. You can see the history of their disruptive editing HERE. In particular, they were attempting to load a non-existent file, "CL_in_2014.jpg", which you can see HERE. On February 9, they were blocked, as you can see on the revision history link above. Today, a newly created account, Clovers91, has coincidently uploaded a photo by the exact same file name, and added it to the article. In addition (and forgive me if I overstep here), another newly created account, Queen lost, has also begun to make disruptive edits on the article. Onel5969 (talk) 15:10, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
. I'm reluctantly endorsing this request with several comments. First, at the point Clovers91 was created and edited the article, Catherinelie was no longer blocked. Second, many users have relatively recently added non-existent images to the article, including (this user apologized, though),, , and. Finally, I see no connection betweeen Queen lost and the other two accounts. Queen lost's contributions are run-of-the-mill, blatant vandalism. and she'll either stop or be indeffed as VOA.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:29, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Catherinelie and Clovers91 are ✅, but as they are editing from a shared IP, I won't go so far as to say confirmed. Almost, but meatpuppetry is also possible. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:14, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeffed and tagged both accounts (saw no point in blocking the master for a shorter duration). No action against Queen lost. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)