Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cavalierman/Archive

Suspected sockpuppets



 * User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
 * Editor interaction utility

Cavalierman made a contribution to A Rape on Campus article, a few moments later an IP made minor correction to his contribution. . Subsequently this same IP has been involved in content disputes on both Political Correctness and Controversial Reddit communities amongst others. This has included seamlessly transferring between several other IP's (all listed above) while maintaining conversation threads, style etc and displaying obvious prior knowledge of users. Tracing back through conversation thread, additional IP's are identified across a variety of linked topics.

IP's listed above in rough order of appearance / initial use. I previously communicated with one when they were making unconstructive updates.

User:Cecil B Pimento appeared afterwards and left obviously antagonistic and bigoted  comments so may be associated if not same user and has been banned. Koncorde (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
 * To be clear, IP is inventing series of events that do not reflect actual contributions (or order of events, and I always leave edit summaries for significant changes or reverts and have spent significant time explaining unsuitability of contributions).
 * I have no issue if he is or isn't Cavalierman, but the pattern of same IP, similar topics, and demonstration of knowledge (however faulty) of Wikipedia practices indicates a more experienced user than small number of contributions otherwise would suggest. Koncorde (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * For further evidence, see User talk:Kimmsjj which shows similar pattern of using bold for emphasis as Cavalierman also used, and as anon-IP currently uses.
 * Prior contact with Dumuzid and displaying some awareness of Dumuzid the second time around.
 * This actually ties back then to Sockpuppet investigations/Cali11298/Archive and Long-term abuse/Cali11298 which Cavalierman profile was associated with, and current IP's demonstrate similar habits, behaviour, and inconsistent writing style. Koncorde (talk) 00:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Comments by other users
''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.''

'''NOTE: I am adding this now. There are a couple changes to what is written below'''
 * This is NOT me: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:A03F:10C3:CE00:1926:D3A:21A4:C61


 * This IS me except for the Lebanese edits. Those are NOT mine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/104.172.234.183


 * This is me except for the last one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/23.114.214.45

I am not really sure where to begin, so I will make this as concise as possible. This is a little frustrating because I am not really sure how to defend myself but I assume there are tools on your end that will be able to back up what I am saying.
 * END NOTE

I edit from 4 different computers - work, home, phone and girlfriends.

I am not Cavalierman and I am not Cecil B Pimento. All the other contributions (with the exception of the note above), from what I can see at this point are mine. Last year I attempted to add SRS to the list of controversial subreddits - it was immediately reverted with zero explanation by Koncorde. This year I attempted an RFC for the same addition, in an effort to get opinions from other editors. My experience on wikipedia has been a living hell ever since.. Please take a look at Koncorde's contributions and tell me he is not guilty of hounding/stalking whatever.

Koncorde has made numerous personal attacks, canvassed other editors, attempted to have ArtW ban me, accused me of being a sock, and now this. All over my attempted SRS addition. Axe to grind? At this point yes. This was an uncontroversial addition that has blown up into thousands of words of texts.

Whatever decision is made, I ask this question. If you look at Koncorde's recent contributions, does he appear to be someone trying to build an encyclopedia? 23.114.214.45 (talk) 02:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ETA - Yes, the IP Koncorde just added is also mine. Is there a point to all of this?2602:301:772D:62D0:44AB:A4CB:7194:17E7 (talk) 22:56, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Yep, the last address Koncorde added is mine too! I can do this all day! Again, what is the point of all this? 76.79.205.162 (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * One point is that you should make an account, so people can address you and your points more easily. And two, you a violating several wikipedia norms that help make wikipedia function. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

more info?
I suspect these two addresses are incidents of wiki-stalking Koncorde by the same person:

(I would probably have ignored this if, the IP-user hadn't brought their conflict to my talk page.) ForbiddenRocky (talk) 21:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes! Those are also both mine (the same IP for all the other ones listed). Thanks ForbiddenRocky, I should have let them know - appreciate the reminder. 23.114.214.45 (talk) 02:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Also possibly: Currently edit warring at Political correctness

Pincrete (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

 * Nothing left to do here. The IP edits are too old. Closing. Bbb23 (talk) 00:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)